Imagine a platform for compliance costs $12,000 per year. Does it cost a lot?
It all depends on the item you are replacing.
If $12,000 is spent to save hundreds of hours collecting evidence in an intricate technological landscape, it could be money worth investing. If a company of seven could collect the same information in only a few hours each month, the result is very different.
It is a great method to look for Vanta alternatives. Asking which platform has the best features is not the first step. Ask your company how these features can help you save time and money.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic Factor
Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically good or bad. Scale changes its value. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments and various applications. Manually collecting evidence could become a serious operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence could easily justify their expense.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees in preparation for its first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. Although a sophisticated platform may have many features however, they’re only useful for organizations that are in need of them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
The search for Vanta or Drata quickly turns into a feature by -feature task. The two platforms are built around automation and interconnected with each other, which means that companies looking for this approach can benefit from having a look at the frameworks available by their integrations, as well as the service and individual quotations and contracts.
However, there’s another choice you have to take. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven compliance platform or not? Some companies want continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Others would rather provide evidence themselves, particularly when the amount of work remains minimal.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Utilize the same model
A lot of Vanta competitors are also in a similar category that focuses on automation. On the market, there are platforms with less cluttered designs that are more focused on system organization as opposed to connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace. It also offers editable guidelines on policies as well as evidence. Auditors have the ability to examine documents submitted using a read-only interface.
It is deliberately not connected to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the documents they would like to provide.
Factor System Access into the Decision
It is obvious that removing integrations will have a disadvantage. One must gather evidence by hand.
It also eliminates integration setup and also means that the application does not require connections to the organization’s operational environment.
Both are equally effective. What is the best choice for your business?
CertAssist is targeted at companies with five to 200 employees and gives pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. The initial price is $225 per month, which is a significant reduction from the standard cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
What is required of a startup with a staff of 10 are not necessarily exactly the same as the company that has 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple A lightweight platform could be a good idea. The costs of automation will increase as systems, employees and frameworks multiply. This is a much better approach to acquire compliance technologies and let complexity take its place.
Don’t buy fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. They’re well worth the money as the work they take over is more costly as compared to manually performing them.